following the example of Lee dice (1943) and others in an attempt to find a single system of classification useful for species conservation I tired in 1972 and later to combine the concept of faunal and floral regions charaterized by marked taxonomic differences and the biome system A working system of classification for the natural
regions of the world was developed and further improved by Udvardy (1975). the result is a system of biotic provinces that differ from each other in either the species of animals and plants that occur within them or show marked difference in vegetation. the biotic provinces for North America the Nearctic portion of it are shown in table 3.2 and figure 3.4 these are broad subdivisions reflecting major differences to be useful locally they require futher breakdown into biotic districts a task which for most provinces remains to be done
table 3.2 biogeographic provinces of nearctic north america (udvady, 1975)
1. sitkan 12. Aleutian Islands
2. oregonnian 13. Alaskan tundra
3. Yukon taiga 14. canadian tundra
4. canadian taiga 15. arctic archipelago
5. eastern forest 16.Green land tundra
6. Austroriparian 17Arctic desert and icecap
7.californian 18. Grasslands
8. sonoran 19.rocky mountains
9. chihuahuan 20. sierra cascade
10. tamaulipan 21. Madrean cordilleran
11.great basin 22. great lakes
Ecologic Niches
Each biome has animals that may have evolved separately from different genetic stocksbut play similar roles or have the same function whether the biome is located in Afica or North america there are a certain number of ecologic niches or places in the environment suited to animals in each biome in the course of evolution species evolve to occupy a particular niche where widely separate areas thus the glasslands of various sizes Althought noungulates were present in Australia to fill these niches the native marsupial stock ha given rise to large grazing kangaroos smaller wallabies wombats and other smaller herbivores suited to occupy the grassland biome A niche simailar to that of the kangaroos may be occupied in america by the pronghon in Eurasia and africa by different gazelles and in south america by the guanaco representing three different families of mammals the presence of these herbivores in turn helps create a niche for a dog like carnivore the dingo in Australia the coyote and wolf in north America the jackel and hunting dog in africa some of these come from different ancestral stocks
this concept of ecologic niche is useful for considering similarities between biomes where similar habits tend to be occupied by species similar in function though not necessarily in appearance. but idea of ecologic niche merits futher consideration grinnell (1943) has used the term to mean the distributional area within which a species is held by its structural or behavioral limitations thus in a grassland region there are many niches for birds. a species such as the meadowlark is adapted only to grasslands or similar areas of low cover within the grassland however categories of food. No other species in the region prefers precisely the same food or cover consequently each species has exclusive occupancy of its own niche although portions of it may be used same niche entirely to seek the same cover and eat the same foods it would compete directly with the meadowlark either the meadowlark would be displaced by its competitor or the competitor could not become established (Gause 1934)
해석부탑드립니다 급해요!!!제발!!!!
Biotic provinces (biogeographical provinces)
following the example of Lee dice (1943) and others in an attempt to find a single system of classification useful for species conservation I tired in 1972 and later to combine the concept of faunal and floral regions charaterized by marked taxonomic differences and the biome system A working system of classification for the natural
regions of the world was developed and further improved by Udvardy (1975). the result is a system of biotic provinces that differ from each other in either the species of animals and plants that occur within them or show marked difference in vegetation. the biotic provinces for North America the Nearctic portion of it are shown in table 3.2 and figure 3.4 these are broad subdivisions reflecting major differences to be useful locally they require futher breakdown into biotic districts a task which for most provinces remains to be done
table 3.2 biogeographic provinces of nearctic north america (udvady, 1975)
1. sitkan 12. Aleutian Islands
2. oregonnian 13. Alaskan tundra
3. Yukon taiga 14. canadian tundra
4. canadian taiga 15. arctic archipelago
5. eastern forest 16.Green land tundra
6. Austroriparian 17Arctic desert and icecap
7.californian 18. Grasslands
8. sonoran 19.rocky mountains
9. chihuahuan 20. sierra cascade
10. tamaulipan 21. Madrean cordilleran
11.great basin 22. great lakes
Ecologic Niches
Each biome has animals that may have evolved separately from different genetic stocksbut play similar roles or have the same function whether the biome is located in Afica or North america there are a certain number of ecologic niches or places in the environment suited to animals in each biome in the course of evolution species evolve to occupy a particular niche where widely separate areas thus the glasslands of various sizes Althought noungulates were present in Australia to fill these niches the native marsupial stock ha given rise to large grazing kangaroos smaller wallabies wombats and other smaller herbivores suited to occupy the grassland biome A niche simailar to that of the kangaroos may be occupied in america by the pronghon in Eurasia and africa by different gazelles and in south america by the guanaco representing three different families of mammals the presence of these herbivores in turn helps create a niche for a dog like carnivore the dingo in Australia the coyote and wolf in north America the jackel and hunting dog in africa some of these come from different ancestral stocks
this concept of ecologic niche is useful for considering similarities between biomes where similar habits tend to be occupied by species similar in function though not necessarily in appearance. but idea of ecologic niche merits futher consideration grinnell (1943) has used the term to mean the distributional area within which a species is held by its structural or behavioral limitations thus in a grassland region there are many niches for birds. a species such as the meadowlark is adapted only to grasslands or similar areas of low cover within the grassland however categories of food. No other species in the region prefers precisely the same food or cover consequently each species has exclusive occupancy of its own niche although portions of it may be used same niche entirely to seek the same cover and eat the same foods it would compete directly with the meadowlark either the meadowlark would be displaced by its competitor or the competitor could not become established (Gause 1934)