서예지의 팬들은 자신의 아이돌을 정당화하는 기사 링크를 적극적으로 트윗하고있다. 기사를 읽은 후에는 기자가 독자들에게 서예지가 피해자라고 믿게 만들고 있다는 인상을 받기 쉽다. 배우 김정현의 소속사 피해자와 그들은 스캔들을 통해 김정현에게 계약을 갱신하도록 강요한다. 기자는 독자를 속이려고 사실을 조작하고 있습니다. 사실, 배우 서예지의 첫 번째 폭력 행위 스캔들은 2013 년 전 급우들이 그녀를 학대했다고 비난하면서 발생했습니다. 서예지는 당시 유명하지 않았고, 누군가가 질투심으로 거짓말을했다고 추측하기 힘들었다. 서예지 변호 기사를 쓴 기자가 단독 인터뷰를 할 수있는 좋은 기회를 가졌다는 점은 주목할 만하다. 여러 배우, 시나리오 작가, "싸이코하지만 괜찮아"시리즈의 감독과의 인터뷰 였고, 시리즈의 공동 프로듀서는 서예지가 참여한 "금메달리스트"소속사였다. 기자의 편견에 대해 이야기 할 수 있을까요? 기자와 달리 증거 없이는 추측하지 않겠습니다. 또한 기사를 쓴 기자가 같은 사람인지, 아니면 위조 기사를 쓴 혐의로 기소 된 기자와 이름이 같은지 확실하지 않습니다. 사이트의 스크린 샷을 추가합니다. 또한이 게시물을 작성하고 있으므로 어제 게시 한 주제를 확장하고 싶습니다. 배우 서예지 공식 팬클럽이 영화를 더 성공적으로 만들기 위해 티켓을 사기 위해 모금하고 (팬클럽이 직접 고시) 기부자들에게 세금 면제를 요청하고 있음을 알게되었습니다. 오늘 트위터는 첫날 18,000 장 이상의 영화 티켓이 팔리 자 "스캔들에 상관없이 여왕은 누구인가"(팬 구문 보존) 서예지를 칭찬하는 기뻐하는 팬 게시물로 가득 차 있었다. 일부 팬들이 무례하게 행동하는 것이 슬프다. 또한 그런 팬클럽의 부정직 한 행동이 서예지의 영화에 대한 특권을 부여해 랭킹 1 위에 올랐고 팀이 속이려고하지 않은 다른 영화들에게 상처를 주었을지도 모른다고 생각합니다.
Seo Ye Ji's fans are actively tweeting a link to an article justifying their idol. After reading the article, it easy to gets the impression that the author is trying to make readers believe that Seo Ye Ji is the victim of actor Kim Jung Hyun's agency and the agency's attempts to force the actor to renew his contract through a scandal. The reporteur is manipulating facts in an attempt to deceive the reader. Actually, actress Seo Ye Ji's first violent behavior scandal erupted back in 2013 when her former classmates accused her of being abusive. Seo Ye Ji was not famous at the time and it was hard to assume that anyone was trying to lie about her out of jealousy (as some of her fans are trying to show at the moment). It is noteworthy that the reporter who wrote the article in defense of Seo Ye Ji had the great opportunity to conduct an several exclusive interview with several actors, screenwriter and director of the series "Psycho but It's ok" (co-producer of the series was " Gold Medalist " agency, in which Seo Yea Ji work ). Can we be sure about biasetely of reporter? Unlike a reporteour, I will not speculate without proof. I am also not sure if reporter who wrote the article is the same person or has a common name with a reporter who was previously accused of writing false and commissioned articles. Also, since I am making this post, I want to extend the topic I posted yesterday. I found that the actress's Seo Yea Ji official fan club was raising money to buy tickets to make her movie more succesfull ( fanclub notificated it by themself ) and asking donors to avoid taxes. Today, Twitter was filled with jubilant fan posts praising Seo Ye Ji "who is the queen no matter scandal" (fan syntax preserved) as more than 18,000 tickets for her movie were sold on the first day. May that kind of dishonest behavior by the fan club allowed Seo Ye Ji's film to be privileged, which put him at the top of the rankings and hurt other films whos team didn't cheat.
서예지 가짜 뉴스
Seo Ye Ji's fans are actively tweeting a link to an article justifying their idol. After reading the article, it easy to gets the impression that the author is trying to make readers believe that Seo Ye Ji is the victim of actor Kim Jung Hyun's agency and the agency's attempts to force the actor to renew his contract through a scandal. The reporteur is manipulating facts in an attempt to deceive the reader. Actually, actress Seo Ye Ji's first violent behavior scandal erupted back in 2013 when her former classmates accused her of being abusive. Seo Ye Ji was not famous at the time and it was hard to assume that anyone was trying to lie about her out of jealousy (as some of her fans are trying to show at the moment). It is noteworthy that the reporter who wrote the article in defense of Seo Ye Ji had the great opportunity to conduct an several exclusive interview with several actors, screenwriter and director of the series "Psycho but It's ok" (co-producer of the series was " Gold Medalist " agency, in which Seo Yea Ji work ). Can we be sure about biasetely of reporter? Unlike a reporteour, I will not speculate without proof. I am also not sure if reporter who wrote the article is the same person or has a common name with a reporter who was previously accused of writing false and commissioned articles. Also, since I am making this post, I want to extend the topic I posted yesterday. I found that the actress's Seo Yea Ji official fan club was raising money to buy tickets to make her movie more succesfull ( fanclub notificated it by themself ) and asking donors to avoid taxes. Today, Twitter was filled with jubilant fan posts praising Seo Ye Ji "who is the queen no matter scandal" (fan syntax preserved) as more than 18,000 tickets for her movie were sold on the first day. May that kind of dishonest behavior by the fan club allowed Seo Ye Ji's film to be privileged, which put him at the top of the rankings and hurt other films whos team didn't cheat.
https://m.pann.nate.com/talk/359157356
https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/076/0003717982?s=09
https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/076/0003614710
https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/076/0003614885
https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/076/0003612948
https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/08/26/2020082603045.html
https://www.reportrash.com/?content=reporter/detail&id=1220
https://app.stillio.com/screenshot/c41289f0-a071-11eb-835c-29f49d100395
https://app.stillio.com/screenshot/ea5798d0-a071-11eb-835c-29f49d100395
https://app.stillio.com/screenshot/5d8e12c0-a072-11eb-835c-29f49d100395