의사양반 볼리비아편 중볼리비아 사태는 ICSID때문이며ISD와는 무관하다는 내용을 말하고 있습니다
http://pann.nate.com/talk/313438179그런데

http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1406&context=sdlp

BECHTEL V. BOLIVIA
Obtaining an investor-to-state dispute settlement is very
valuable to multinational companies (“MNCs”) that do not
trust the local court systems in the countries in which they
invest or want a lower threshold for takings compensation than
the host country law provides.

볼리비아 사태에 대해서 ISD(investor-to-state dispute)문제로 보고있는 논문입니다
그런데 이런 말 할것도 없이 ISD 자체가 국가-투자자 제소권 전반의 내용을 일컫는 용어입니다ICSID에 관계된것이라 해서 ISD문제가 아니라고 하며 한미 FTA와는 무관하다 하는 말은근본적으로 잘못된 말입니다.
Investor-state disputes

This expansive definition of expropriation or taking has led to a surge of cases brought against host countries by investors. Having settled about 60 cases in four decades, one of the frequently used 'courts' for these disputes, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), now has over 40 cases currently pending. This has been confirmed by a study by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). A spate of claims related to Argentina's financial crisis (34 known claims) has contributed to the recent spike in arbitral activity. However, even when these Argentine claims are controlled for, investment treaty arbitration is on an upward trajectory. Furthermore, the actual number of cases being litigated is even higher as claims under some rules (UNCITRAL, ICC, SCC, etc.) do not have to be made public.

ISD(Investor-State-Disputes)에 ICSID, UNCITRAL, ICC, SCC 가 다 포함되어서 사용된다는걸알 수 있습니다.이런 이유로 한미 FTA 반대논리 전반을 거짓이라 말하는건.스스로 잘못된 프레임을 만드는거나 다름없다고 봅니다.