본문 바로가기
책갈피

도와주세요

안녕하세요ㅠㅠ 학생인데요,

내일 급하게 낼 자료가 있는데 제가 외국유학 한번 다녀온적이 없는지라, 문법오류가 많을까봐 걱정되서 도움좀 주세요^^ 외국서 살다오신 분들, 영어 정말 잘하시는분들 문법오류나 문맥상 맞지 않는 표현 등 좀 고쳐주시겠어요? 죄송합니다ㅠㅠ 급해서^^;

아 그리고 전 중2인데 실력 많이 뒤떨어지나요?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<Rethinking the PRISONER'S DILEMMA-for teens>

During the Cold War between the United States(US) and the Soviet Union(USSR), they held each other in check about weaponeering. In other words, they were engaged in an arms race(If the Soviet Union discovers the most destructive one, the United States produce the other one without a break). But for either country, it was a 'Smashing Blow'`if actually occurs because of a nuclear war. So it was just 'Blowing Money'`for two countries. For that reason they made an bilateral agreement. They had a distrust for each other, though. They were filled with trepidation ; for fear of making weapons. Ultimately, both discovered their own weapons.

So, here it goes. Let's consider it from a different standpoint ; the US and the USSR ➪ prisoners / weaponeering ➪ confessing / non-weaponeering ➪ buttoning the prisoners' lips.

Did this instance make the burden too heavy for you? Please take a look at the prisoner's dilemma stated below.

The classical prisoner's dilemma is as follows :

Two suspects, Ⓐ and Ⓑ, are arrested by police authorities. The police have a vague evidence so visit each of them to offer the same deal ; ⒜ If one of two betrays and confesses his crime, he'll get free and the other will serve 10 years. ⒝ If both two betray each other and confess, both will serve 5 years. ⒞ If both don't confess, both will serve 6 months.

Division

Prisoner B stays silent

Prisoner B betrays

Prisoner A stays silent

Both serve 6 months

A serves 10 years

B gets free

Prisoner A betrays

A gets free

B serves 10 years

Both serve 2 years



So this dilemma tosses a question ; How should the prisoners act? And, see this in a different way, how would you guys act?

Each prisoner has two options, cooperates with the other and does not confess to a crime, or betray. Finally, in the prisoner's dilemma, the fear of receiving a long jail term will lead both individuals to confess to the crime, even though they would have the minimum term from cooperating. As aforementioned, this case will be the most prevalent condition of the prisoner's dilemma. And this will demonstrates 'Nash Equilibrium'`.

Then, each of you can wholly understand what is the prisoner's dilemma and the case of the Cold War between the US and the USSR.

In the case of the US and the USSR shows that rational resolutions in international relations aren't always the best determination possible.

This time, I'll give an entertaining explanation. The undermentioned case is angled towards juveniles.

Did you watch the drama Queen Seonduk`aired on 2009? It was an outstanding work that told about the first Queen in our 5000-year history. And, concentrate your attention, trace back a dim memory. Remember? There was a case of the prisoner's dilemma.

Do you realize that the `Queen Seonduk`ascended the throne after Gaya`subjection? So, a meeting that longed for `Gaya` restoration is the Bokyahoe`. However, Bidam`arrested a group of people that seemed like the `Bokyahoe` and made a forgery with his secret code.

At last, he forced the suspect Ⓐ to read a forgery(secret code). Ⓐ said "I don't know anything at all", Bidam`told Ⓑ an absolute lie that Ⓐ confessed everything. And this dilemma went around to the suspect Ⓒ,Ⓓ,Ⓔ … . Finally, all suspects confessed their secret code.

Besides, we could find it in other drama, Jejungwon`. Minyoungik `judged people with the same way as Bidam`did.

These dilemmas in dramas are well known for the best case of the prisoner's dilemma and used for joke once in a while.

So the consequence is that this episode in historical drama can be an apt instance of the prisoner's dilemma.

By Adam Smith's account, in market economy, all individuals act to maximize their own profit or gain. At length, this can be beneficial to all of us and our society. But, the prisoner's dilemma overturned this established theory, and it was revealed by Melvin Dresher and Merrill Flood on 1950. Actually, life is full of social contradictions and dilemmas. Most of these contradictions are so notional and abstract, but the prisoner's dilemma is entirely different from the 'Common Contradiction'`. It'll have a decisive effect on various parts, especially a private enterprise and the international situation. In addition, criminal psychology.

In my private opinion, ignored mathematical probability, a chief cause of the prisoner's dilemma is `distrust`, and `trust` will be a sort of solution. I mention it only as an aside, if the criminals commit the crime, they should reflect deeply on what they done. Our society also has to back up many resources such as a career·technique·welfare for the rehabilitation of an ex-convict.

Did you guys absolutely figure out about the prisoner's dilemma? Pupils in our Bangsan seem real geniuses so all of you can apply this dilemma in many quarters. Then you can be the very person of 'Vastly Superior'`society.

I really want to stress that point, and it deserves special emphasis. When individuals seek undemocratic decision-making for their advantages, that may gives rise to the social costs. In short, an era of uncertainty induces individuals to confess, though there is the fine middle ground for each other. To untangle the knot of contradictory advice, we have to desperately seek better and immediate solution, such as an utopia for an infertile and dry society.

In the meantime, thank you for giving me your time and consideration...

추천수0
반대수0

공감많은 뉴스 시사

더보기

뉴스 플러스